Learn more. ❤️, I have always been a great admirer of Kael's film criticism, even while most of the time I didn't agree with her. It's the scent of socioeconomic snobbery mingling with crass anti-intellectualism, seasoned with homophobia and critical laziness. As a result, the pieces in the book are culled from radio broadcasts that she did while she was at KPFA, as well as numerous periodicals, including Moviegoer, the Massachusetts Review, Sight and Sound, Film Culture, Film Quarterly and Partisan Review. Sarris's reaction was in response to Kael's denunciation of the Auteur theory's merits, and has, in later years, occasionally jabbed at Kael's work. I will not - I cannot - part with it; it is one of the buildi. Worth reading for the degree to which Kael’s personality (which I enjoy) comes through, but ultimately I found it really difficult to understand the context of a time in cinema that I’m only glancingly familiar with - or even a broader cultural context which feels more than a few critical moments ago. (or, Some Unhappy Thoughts on Siegfried Kracauer's Theory of Film: The Redemption of Physical Reality)'", Link to 'Fantasies of the Art-House Audience' essay", An essay entitled "Replying to Listeners", located in section III of the book, Afterglow: A Last Conversation with Pauline Kael, https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=I_Lost_It_at_the_Movies&oldid=973810894, Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Thank you for visiting my website! Pauline Kael wrote masterful prose in the service of the flickering world we see on the screen. Collect bonus rewards from our … I lost it at the movies by Pauline Kael, 1965, Little, Brown edition, in English - [1st ed.] I Lost it at the Movies. Some good stuff, but I'm afraid I found my attention wandering at times. Music for (silent) film started in France when Saint-Saëns composed an original score for The Assassination of the Duke of Guise ( L’Assassinat du duc de Guise, 1908) and Hollywood took it from there. It is about something else. In the process, Macdonald confutes some of the assertions Kael makes about his own opinions regarding certain movies. I also love how she often will gauge the reactions of an audience around her, even mentioning comments by people made during the viewing. Disclaimer:Pages can have notes/highlighting. Lemony Snicket: The Unauthorized Autobiography, Excerpts from 'Is There a Cure for Film Criticism? Fuck, even when I disagree with her (really, how can she hate La Dolce Vita?) A bit heavy for me. Fast and free shipping free returns cash on delivery available on eligible purchase. There's no doubt Pauline KAEL has a fancy way of saying things. I Lost It At The Movies is the first book of criticism by iconic film critic Pauline Kael. I mean, I took this book because I thought it's about movies, but I've found out that it's about people watching the movies. This week, host Bill McGlaughlin celebrates the music of the cinema. Not shy with her opinions, there's rarely a dull moment. I really miss her writing. I Lost It at the Movies is a 1965 book that serves as a compendium of movie reviews written by Pauline Kael, a film critic from The New Yorker, from 1954 to 1965. January 1st 1994 She's a really great writer, so it's enjoyable even when I don't agree with her. Couldn't get into it. Like Fran Lebowitz, I could happily sit down at a party while she held court over cigarette after cigarette, and went through the failings of everyone in the room and a significant number of people outside of it. “Really, it's not people who don't understand us who drive us nuts—it's when those who shouldn't, “An artist must either give up art or develop.”, See 1 question about I Lost it at the Movies…, New African American Histories and Biographies to Read Now. Also, she knew what really worked on film, directer's wonderful "trashy talent" those moments in film that. Call me misguided but Pauline Kael is basically the most unpleasant critic I've ever come across. I Lost it at the Movies: Amazon.co.uk: Books. “I Lost It at the Movies” author : KAEL “I Lost It at the Movies” is collection of film reviews by critic Pauline Kael that was published in one volume in 1965. (It never happened, but that is a long story. but still problematic, One of the greats. Atlantic Monthly / Little, Brown, 1965. __-Tiki : KON I have always been a Pauline Kael fan. Pauline Kael's reviews shook my world; here was someone who could write insightfully, bring in current and past events, make connections and do so thoughtfully and without pomposity. The book was a bestseller upon its first release, and is now published by Marion Boyars Publishers. The name of the fictional author given, "Lena Pukalie", is also an anagram of Pauline Kael. I'm immensely, immensely charmed. Home / Events / Film, Front Page / I Lost it at the Movies. I have being seeing films once a week for over 20 years. Visit our site for daily crossword clues I Lost it at the Movies. There's no doubt Pauline KAEL has a fancy way of saying things. I love the way she writes about movies -- even when I don't agree with her, or have no idea what she's talking about, it makes me excited about film and I find myself wanting to watch Last Year at Marienbad again (which normally is the kind of idea that should make you say OH FOR HEAVEN'S SAKE, NO.) when she discussed films I’d never heard of it was like reading a foreign language. by Marion Boyars Publishers. (Actually, he thinks it was 12 years ag o so I’ve done some very minor editing–anybody with the semicolon skills of Stephen requires only the least bit of tweaking.) News, author interviews, critics' picks and more. I have always been a great admirer of Kael's film criticism, even while most of the time I didn't agree with her. Some, but not all, of these writings are included in this book. She was the regular film reviewer for McCall’s for some months in 1966 and for The New Republic in… There are no discussion topics on this book yet. Kael’s problem isn’t that she’s a contrarian, but that she’s obsessed with the lonely, vigilante allure of being a contrarian (i.e. When I ask friends why they like or don't like a book or movie, I really want to know if their are ideas and connections I'm missing, if the cinematography helps tell the story, if there are motifs or themes that carry home an idea. This is a collection of her early, pre-New Yorker, writings about film. I Lost it at the Movies She pulls no punches in regard to her opinions on film, actors, directors, and especially other critics. many of the films from this era were unfamiliar to me, but several of her essays are thought provoking as well and reflect the tenor of the times. I Lost It at the Movies NPR coverage of I Lost It at the Movies: Film Writings 1954-1965 by Pauline Kael. undid some of my prejudices. many of the films from this era were unfamiliar to me, but several of her essays are thought provoking as well and reflect the tenor of the times. I lost it at the movies. Get this from a library! It is about something else. Watch Exclusive 'Shadow in the Cloud' Clip: We're Diving Read More; This Week in Movie News: ‘Revenge of the Nerds’ Rebooted, Chris Pine to Star in ‘Dungeons and Dragons’ and More Eight years after her death, she remains a controversial figure - a lot of people loved her, some hated her - but what is also true is, though she has thousands of imitators, she remains the greatest movie critic of them all. Kael’s problem isn’t that she’s a contrarian, but that she’s obsessed with the lonely, vigilante allure of being a contrarian (i.e. What Truffat called the beauty of cinema. The ideal critic has to have a certain passivity, and a willi. Usually, he was the last person to leave; he studied end credits, even noting a film's financiers. All of Kael's writing is about Kael, never the movie. Unfort. All of that said, in many ways the woman was a raving lunatic, and that also comes through. In the other hand, she shows tough resistance towards everything new : french new wave, Fellini, Auteur theory, etc. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “We are not makers of history. Even when you disagreed, you learned an idea from Kael about the topic. What I like especially about Miss Kael's book is that it is written from the outside. When I ask friends why they like or don't like a book or movie, I really want to know if their are ideas and connections I'm missing, if the cinematography helps tell the story, if there are motifs or themes that carry home an idea. Download Full I Lost It At The Movies Book in PDF, EPUB, Mobi and All Ebook Format. When an interviewer asked her in later years as to what she had "lost", as indicated in the title, Kael averred: "There are so many kinds of innocence to be lost at the movies. 0 0. This is her first book of reviews which includes the infamous review of the Sound of Music which got her fired from Esquire. Otis Ferguson, James Agee and Andrew Sarris still retain much of their felicity. Let us know what’s wrong with this preview of, Published Paul Kael is in continuous reaction to the people's reaction to movies. *FREE* shipping on qualifying offers. This is her first book of reviews which includes the infamous review of the Sound of Music which got her fired from Esquire. It contains her negative review of the then widely acclaimed West Side Story, glowing reviews of other movies such as The Golden Coach and Seven Samurai, as well as longer polemical essays such as her largely negative critical responses to Siegfried Kracauer's Theory of Film and Andrew Sarris's Film Culture essay Notes on the Auteur Theory, 1962. I Lost It at the Movies. Or, Some Unhappy Thoughts on Siegfried Kracauer's, This page was last edited on 19 August 2020, at 10:01. Try Prime Hello, Sign in Account & Lists Sign in Account & Lists Returns & Orders Try Prime Basket. Unfortunately, Ms. Kael has long since left this world and Ms. Lebowitz runs in circles far posher than mine, but they both left their books. Miss Kael is a gifted writer and an exemplar critic. The trouble with most film criticism today is that it isn't criticism. My favorite film critic of all time wrote some of the greatest and most perceptive critiques ever. The book was published prior to Kael's long stint at The New Yorker. Hello Select your address Books Hello, Sign in. Paperback. And I'd recommend them universally. He also questions the validity of some of her assessments of a few movies, including Hiroshima Mon Amour, 8½, and Last Year in Marienbad, stating that she is "perversely literal-minded" and comments upon "her ascetic insensibility to the sensual pleasures of cinema...when she dislikes the literary content. From 1962–64, Kael had written for a short-lived section of Film Quarterly entitled Films of the Quarter, alongside other critics such as Stanley Kauffmann and the screenwriter Gavin Lambert. Kael taught me to to better appreciate a film, provided perspective, she delved into. But what she says is far from being fancy. Her work is essential reading, her writing style is shot thru with sarcasm and yet stunningly erudite. I read and read and didn't want to stop. Agree or disagree, but hear her out. GOING BACK TO MOVIE THEATERS Read More ... Get your swag on with discounted movies to stream at home, exclusive movie gear, access to advanced screenings and discounts galore. So many have tried to imitate her but no one had the same elegance and bite. She's a really great writer, so it's enjoyable even when I don't agree with her. Kael taught me to to better appreciate a film, provided perspective, she delved into themes and ideas, and her writing was as smooth as butter. I'm immensely, immensely charmed. Search. Fuck, even when I disagree with her (really, how can she hate La Dolce Vita?) Examples of his critical observations are available in his books, e.g., The Primal Screen and Politics and Cinema. This took me a loooong time to get through. There are related clues (shown below). To be honest, I thought this was occasionally. Listen up for film reviews, thoughts on cinemas past, present … Maybe best as a resource for some of the specific films covered, many of which I now need to see. But what she says is far from being fancy. Find books like I Lost it at the Movies: Film Writings, 1954-1965 from the world’s largest community of readers. This makes for criticism that’s generally less constructive and illuminating than monomaniacally obsessed with pointing out why everyone else is wrong, with dissecting why movies are terrible without giving them much of a fair shake, jumping to conclusions and dismissing viewpoints with maniacal abandon.